1. Bouma, J., Brouwer, R., van Ek, R., 2000. The use of integrated assessment methods in Dutch water management: a comparison of cost-benefit and multi-criteria analysis. Third International Conference of the European Society for Ecological Economics, Vienna, May 3–6, 2000.
2. Buchy, M., Hoverman, S., Averill, C., 1999. Understanding public participation in forest planning in Australia: how can we learn from each other? ANU Forestry Occasional Paper 99.2, Australian National University, Canberra, http://www.anu.edu.au/Forestry/publications/staff.
3. Understanding public participation: a review;Buchy;Forest Policy and Economics,2000
4. Carbone, F., De Montis, A., De Toro, P., Stagl, S., 2000. MCDA methods comparison: environmental policy evaluation applied to a case study in Italy. Third International Conference of the European Society for Ecological Economics, Vienna, Austria, May 3–6, 2000.
5. Valuing the social dimension. Social assessment in the regional forest agreement process;Coakes;Australian Journal of Environmental Economics,1998