Assessing the utility of common arguments used in expert review of in silico predictions as part of ICH M7 assessments-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Assessing the utility of common arguments used in expert review of in silico predictions as part of ICH M7 assessments

Published:2023-10 Issue: Volume:144 Page:105490
ISSN:0273-2300
Container-title:Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
language:en
Short-container-title:Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

Author:

Cayley Alex N.,Foster Robert S.^ORCID,Brigo Alessandro,Muster Wolfgang,Musso Alyssa,Kenyon Michelle O.,Parris Patricia,White Angela T.,Cohen-Ohana Mirit,Nudelman Raphael,Glowienke Susanne

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Toxicology,General Medicine

Reference46 articles.

1. Do carboxylic/sulfonic acid halides really present a mutagenic and carcinogenic risk as impurities in final drug products?;Amberg;Org. Process Res. Dev.,2015

2. Principles and procedures for implementation of ICH M7 recommended (Q)SAR analyses;Amberg;Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol.,2016

3. Principles and procedures for handling out-of-domain and indeterminate results as part of ICH M7 recommended (Q)SAR analyses;Amberg;Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol.,2019

4. Denitrosation of diphenylnitrosamine in vivo;Appel;Toxicol. Lett.,1984

5. Enzymatic denitrosation of diphenylnitrosamine: activation or inactivation?;Appel;Arch. Toxicol.,1987

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. From model performance to decision support – The rise of computational toxicology in chemical safety assessments;Computational Toxicology;2024-09

2. A framework to support the application of the OECD guidance documents on (Q)SAR model validation and prediction assessment for regulatory decisions;Computational Toxicology;2024-06

3. Pobody’s Nerfect: (Q)SAR works well for predicting bacterial mutagenicity of pesticides and their metabolites, but predictions for clastogenicity in vitro have room for improvement;Computational Toxicology;2024-06