A Historical and Contemporary Review of Questionnaires Used in the Management of Post-Radical Prostatectomy Patients

Author:

Cooper Caleb A.123,Sloan Matthew J.123,Singh Armaan45,Fantus Richard J.123678,Raheem Omer A.123

Affiliation:

1. Section of Urology , Chicago, IL , USA

2. Department of Surgery , Chicago, IL , USA

3. University of Chicago Medicine , Chicago, IL , USA

4. Pritzker School of Medicine , Chicago, IL , USA

5. University of Chicago , Chicago, IL , USA

6. Section of Urology , Evanston, IL , USA

7. Department of Surgery , Evanston, IL , USA

8. NorthShore University Health System , Evanston, IL , USA

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) face obstacles to recovery spanning the domains of erectile and sexual function; urinary function; and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Numerous patient-directed questionnaires exist that serve to assist in the care of these men. Aim To describe patient-directed questionnaires of historical and contemporary relevance involving the evaluation and treatment of men after radical prostatectomy. Methods A comprehensive review of peer-reviewed publications on the topic was performed. Using PubMed, the search terms used were: "radical prostatectomy; erectile function; lower urinary tract symptoms; sexual dysfunction; urinary incontinence; and health-related quality of life. Main Outcome Measure: We aimed to summarize questionnaires and survey devices of historical and contemporary importance for the care of men after RP. Results Many questionnaires have been developed specifically for, or conscripted for use in, the care of men after RP. Some of the oldest questionnaires relating to sexual function, urinary function, and general and cancer-specific QoL are important and still utilized in the routine clinical care of post-RP patients. However, recent devices that may offer clinicians a more comprehensive understanding to aid in the evaluation and care of these men. Conclusions Post-RP patients face numerous challenges that require a thoughtful approach, one that is broad enough to identify a variety of potential physical and emotional disturbances, yet granular enough to identify appropriate areas for intervention. While there is not a “best” questionnaire for this population, having an appropriate understanding of the current available instruments and what information they provide may help clinicians more thoroughly assess and treat these men.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Urology,Obstetrics and Gynecology,Reproductive Medicine,Endocrinology,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Psychiatry and Mental health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3