No difference in 30-day outcome and quality of life in transradial versus transfemoral access – Results from the German Austrian ABSORB registry (GABI-R)-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

No difference in 30-day outcome and quality of life in transradial versus transfemoral access – Results from the German Austrian ABSORB registry (GABI-R)

Published:2021-11 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:1553-8389
Container-title:Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
language:en
Short-container-title:Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine

Author:

Wein Bastian,Zaczkiewicz Myron,Graf Matthias,Zimmermann Oliver,Gori Tommaso,Nef Holger M.,Kastner Johannes,Mehilli Julinda,Richardt Gert,Wöhrle Jochen,Achenbach Stephan,Riemer Thomas,Hamm Christian,Torzewski Jan

Funder

Abbott Vascular

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,General Medicine

Reference28 articles.

1. The M Word: is routine transfemoral PCI defensible in 2018?;Todd,2018

2. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in people with coronary artery disease;Kolkailah;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2018

3. Radial versus femoral access for coronary interventions across the entire Spectrum of patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials;Ferrante;JACC Cardiovasc Interv,2016

4. Effect of radial versus femoral access on radiation dose and the importance of procedural volume: a substudy of the multicenter randomized RIVAL trial;Jolly;JACC Cardiovasc Interv,2013

5. ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization;Neumann;EuroIntervention,2018

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A Time-Out for Arterial Access;Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine;2022-07