Direct or indirect? Assessing two approaches to the measurement of strategic voting-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Direct or indirect? Assessing two approaches to the measurement of strategic voting

Published:2005-06 Issue:2 Volume:24 Page:163-176
ISSN:0261-3794
Container-title:Electoral Studies
language:en
Short-container-title:Electoral Studies

Author:

Blais André,Young Robert,Turcotte Martin

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Political Science and International Relations

Reference30 articles.

1. Aarts, K., 2000. The Impact of Leader Evaluations on Voting in The Netherlands. Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington DC, August 31–September 3.

2. ‘Sophisticated’ voting in the 1988 presidential primaries;Abramson;American Political Science Review,1992

3. Rational choice and turnout;Aldrich;American Journal of Political Science,1993

4. When politics and models collide: estimating models of multiparty elections;Alvarez;American Journal of Political Science,1998

5. A new approach for modeling strategic voting in multiparty elections;Alvarez;British Journal of Political Science,2000

Cited by 52 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Sincere, Strategic, or Something Else? The Impact of Ranked-Choice Voting on Voter Decision Making Processes;American Politics Research;2024-03-20

2. Does the rule matter? A comparison of preference elicitation methods and voting rules based on data from an Austrian regional parliamentary election in 2019;Public Choice;2023-06-26

3. Do (Perceptions of) Electoral Polling Affect Voters' Behavior? Campaigns, Partisan Bias, and Strategic Voting;Revista Latinoamericana de Opinión Pública;2023-01-10

4. The “Tipping Point” of a Strategic Vote: When Does an Individual Vote Strategically?;Canadian Journal of Political Science;2022-06-06

5. Economic and Ethical Motivations for Forest Restoration and Incentive Payments;Society & Natural Resources;2021-07-14