Commercial quality “awards” are not a strong indicator of quality surgical care-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Commercial quality “awards” are not a strong indicator of quality surgical care

Published:2018-09 Issue:3 Volume:164 Page:379-386
ISSN:0039-6060
Container-title:Surgery
language:en
Short-container-title:Surgery

Author:

Cobb Adrienne N.,Erickson Taylor R.,Kothari Anai N.,Eguia Emanuel,Brownlee Sarah A.,Yao Weiwei,Choi Hyunyou,Greenberg Victoria,Mboya Joy,Voss Michael,Raicu Daniela Stan,Settimi-Woods Raffaella,Kuo Paul C.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Surgery

Reference30 articles.

1. Choosing the best hospital: the limitations of public quality reporting;Rothberg;Health Aff (Millwood),2008

2. Public reporting of hospital quality shows inconsistent ranking results;Emmert;Health Policy,2017

3. Rating the raters: The inconsistent quality of health care performance measurement;Shahian;Ann Surg,2016

4. The quality measurement crisis: An urgent need for methodological standards and transparency;Shahian;Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf,2016

5. National hospital ratings systems share few common scores and may generate confusion instead of clarity;Austin;Health Aff (Millwood),2015

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Determining the value proposition of surgical care in CMS star rated hospitals;The American Journal of Surgery;2023-03

2. Corrigendum to Commercial Quality “Awards” Are Not a Strong Indicator of Quality Surgical Care [Surgery 164 (2018) 379–386];Surgery;2020-02

3. Erfassung der Versorgungsqualität und Realität;Versorgungsqualität in der operativen Medizin;2020

4. Data resource profile: State Inpatient Databases;International Journal of Epidemiology;2019-07-06