Modified natural cycle IVF versus conventional stimulation in advanced-age Bologna poor responders-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Modified natural cycle IVF versus conventional stimulation in advanced-age Bologna poor responders

Published:2019-10 Issue:4 Volume:39 Page:698-703
ISSN:1472-6483
Container-title:Reproductive BioMedicine Online
language:en
Short-container-title:Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Author:

Drakopoulos Panagiotis,Romito Alessia,Errázuriz Joaquín,Santos-Ribeiro Samuel,Popovic-Todorovic Biljana,Racca Annalisa,Tournaye Herman,De Vos Michel,Blockeel Christophe

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Developmental Biology,Reproductive Medicine,Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Reference26 articles.

1. The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting;Balaban;Human Reproduction,2011

2. Embryo implantation rates in natural and stimulated assisted reproduction treatment cycles in poor responders;Ata;Reproductive BioMedicine Online,2008

3. Induction of Multiple Follicular Development by a Single Dose of Long-Acting Recombinant Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH-CTP, Corifollitropin Alfa) for Controlled Ovarian Stimulation beforein vitro fertilization;Devroey;The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism,2004

4. Modified Natural Cycle Using GnRH Antagonist Can Be an Optional Treatment in Poor Responders Undergoing IVF;Elizur;J. Assist. Reprod. Genet.,2005

5. ESHRE consensus on the definition of ‘poor response’ to ovarian stimulation forin vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria;Ferraretti;Human Reproduction,2011

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The cumulative live birth rate and cost-effectiveness of the clomiphene and gonadotropin cotreatment protocol versus the mid-luteal GnRH agonist protocol in women over 35 years old;Scientific Reports;2024-06-05

2. Comparison of embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes for patients with low ovarian reserve in natural cycles and mildly stimulated cycles: a cohort study;Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology;2024-01-23

3. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation parameters are not associated with de novo chromosomal abnormality rates and clinical pregnancy outcomes in preimplantation genetic testing;Frontiers in Endocrinology;2023-01-12

4. Treatment modalities for poor ovarian responders;Therapeutic Advances in Reproductive Health;2023-01

5. Stimulation des patientes faibles répondeuses en FIV;Infertilité;2023