The consequences of S.H. and Others v. Austria for legislation on gamete donation in Europe: an ethical analysis of the European Court of Human Rights judgments-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The consequences of S.H. and Others v. Austria for legislation on gamete donation in Europe: an ethical analysis of the European Court of Human Rights judgments

Published:2012-12 Issue:7 Volume:25 Page:665-669
ISSN:1472-6483
Container-title:Reproductive BioMedicine Online
language:en
Short-container-title:Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Author:

Van Hoof Wannes,Pennings Guido

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Developmental Biology,Reproductive Medicine,Obstetrics and Gynecology

Reference10 articles.

1. ECtHR, 2010. S.H. and others v. Austria. First Section judgement. Available from: .

2. ECtHR, 2011. S.H. and others v. Austria. Grand Chamber judgement. Available from: .

3. Gianaroli, 2010. Quoted in interview: European Court declares Austria’s ban on gamete donation unjustified. Focus on Reproduction May 2010, 7.

4. Reproductive tourism as moral pluralism in motion;Pennings;J. Med. Ethics,2002

5. The European Judge as comparatist;Rozakis;Tul. L. Rev.,2005

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Mapping Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications (ELSI) of gamete donation;Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics;2024-08-26

2. The right to healthcare during the covid-19 pandemic under the European Convention on human rights;The International Journal of Human Rights;2022-01-31

3. Breaking out of the Regulatory Delusion. The Ban to Surrogacy and the Foundations of European Constitutionalism;Global Jurist;2020-01-28

4. La donación anónima de óvulos en Europa. Los problemas sobre el discurso de «donar vida»;Revista de Antropología Social;2018-12-13

5. Ethics of oocyte banking for third-party assisted reproduction: a systematic review;Human Reproduction Update;2018-05-14