1. Forensic Science Regulator, “Codes of practice and conduct: Development of evaluative opinions (FSR-C-118),” published by Forensic Science Regulator in partnership with the Chartered Society of Forensic Sciences and the Royal Statistical Society, Tech. Rep. Issue 1, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/602407728fa8f5146f0769d9/FSR-C-118_Interpretation_Appendix_Issue_1__002_.pdf.
2. A. Drygajło, M. Jessen, S. Gfrörer, I. Wagner, J. Vermeulen, and T. Niemi, “Methodological guidelines for best practice in forensic semiautomatic and automatic speaker recognition including guidance on the conduct of proficiency testing and collaborative exercises,” European Network of Forensic Science Institutes (ENFSI), Tech. Rep., 2015. [Online]. Available: http://enfsi.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/guidelines_fasr_and_fsasr_0.pdf.
3. Building a unified statistical framework for the forensic identification of source problems;Ommen;Law, Probabil. Risk,2018
4. Validation of forensic automatic likelihood ratio methods;Ramos,2020
5. S. Willis, L. McKenna, S. McDermott, G. O’Donnell, A. Barrett, B. Rasmusson, A. Nordgaard, C. Berger, M. Sjerps, J. Molina, G. Zadora, C. Aitken, L. Lunt, C. Champod, A. Biedermann, T. Hicks, and F. Taroni, ENFSI guideline for evaluative reporting in forensic science, 3rd ed., European Network of Forensic Science Institutes (ENFSI), 2015. [Online]. Available: https://enfsi.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/m1_guideline.pdf.