Distinguishing between forensic science and forensic pseudoscience: Testing of validity and reliability, and approaches to forensic voice comparison-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Distinguishing between forensic science and forensic pseudoscience: Testing of validity and reliability, and approaches to forensic voice comparison

Author:

Morrison Geoffrey Stewart

Funder

Australian Research Council

Australian Federal Police

New South Wales Police

Queensland Police

National Institute of Forensic Science

Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association

Guardia Civil

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference45 articles.

1. Trashing “junk science”;Edmond;Stanford Technology Law Review,1998

2. Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward;National Research Council,2009

3. The Real CSI: How Reliable is the Science Behind Forensics? PBS Frontline;Cediel,2012

4. Acculturating forensic science: what is ‘scientific culture’, and how can forensic scientists adopt it?;Cole;Fordham Urban Law Journal,2010

5. Response to Draft Australian Standard: DR AS 5388.3 Forensic Analysis — Part 3 — Interpretation;Morrison,2012

Cited by 33 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Forensic Voice Comparison Approaches for Low‐Resource Languages;Automatic Speech Recognition and Translation for Low Resource Languages;2024-03-29