Competition–regulation interface in telecommunications: What’s left of the essential facility doctrine-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Competition–regulation interface in telecommunications: What’s left of the essential facility doctrine

Published:2010-02 Issue:1-2 Volume:34 Page:23-35
ISSN:0308-5961
Container-title:Telecommunications Policy
language:en
Short-container-title:Telecommunications Policy

Author:

Renda Andrea

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Information Systems,Communication,Library and Information Sciences,Economics and Econometrics,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Management Information Systems

Reference26 articles.

1. The microsoft judgment and its implications for competition policy towards dominant firms in Europe;Ahlborn;Antitrust Law Journal,2009

2. Akman, P. (2007). Searching for the long-lost soul of Article 82EC. Working paper no. 07-5, University of East Anglia, Centre for Competition Policy.

3. ARCEP (2006). Very high-speed points of reference and outlook. Press points, 10 November 2006.

4. Essential facilities: An epithet in need of limiting principles;Areeda;Antitrust Law Journal,1990

5. Areeda, Phillip, & Herbert Hovenkamp (2002). Antitrust law, 2nd ed., Aspen Publishers.

Cited by 26 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Article 102 [Prohibition of Abuses of a Dominant Position];Springer Commentaries on International and European Law;2022

2. Scoping new policy frameworks for local and community broadband networks;Telecommunications Policy;2021-11

3. Big Data and Digital Markets Contestability: Theory of Harm and Data Access Remedies;Journal of Competition Law & Economics;2021-08-27

4. Developing a new mobile network ownership model using a risk allocation framework;International Journal of Mobile Communications;2021

5. Big Data and Digital Markets Contestability: Theory of Harm and Data Access Remedies;SSRN Electronic Journal;2021