Comparison of Procedural Complications With Versus Without Interventional Cardiology Fellows-in-Training During Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparison of Procedural Complications With Versus Without Interventional Cardiology Fellows-in-Training During Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Published:2014-01 Issue:1 Volume:113 Page:44-48
ISSN:0002-9149
Container-title:The American Journal of Cardiology
language:en
Short-container-title:The American Journal of Cardiology

Author:

Stolker Joshua M.,Allen Drew S.,Cohen David J.,Kennedy Kevin F.,Laster Steven B.,Frutkin Andrew D.,Mehta Sameer K.,O'Neal Kelly R.,Marso Steven P.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference19 articles.

1. Identification of variables needed to risk adjust outcomes of coronary interventions: evidence-based guidelines for efficient data collection;Block;J Am Coll Cardiol,1998

2. Validation of risk adjustment models for in-hospital percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty mortality on an independent data set;Moscucci;J Am Coll Cardiol,1999

3. National Cardiovascular Data Registry: Data elements & definitions. Technology downloads and risk adjustment. Available at: https://www.ncdr.com/webncdr/cathpci/home/datacollection. Accessed January 16, 2013.

4. Safety of percutaneous left heart catheterization directly performed by cardiology fellows: a cohort analysis;Agostoni;J Invasive Cardiol,2006

5. A prospective randomized trial of 0.010″ versus 0.014″ balloon PTCA systems and interventional fellow versus attending physician as primary operator in elective PTCA: economic, technical, and clinical end points;Talley;J Interv Cardiol,1995

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Percutaneous brachial artery access for coronary artery procedures: Feasible and safe in the current era;Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine;2015-12