Arguments for and proposed tests of a revised S-R contiguity-reinforcement theory of human Pavlovian autonomic conditioning: Some contra-cognitive claims-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Arguments for and proposed tests of a revised S-R contiguity-reinforcement theory of human Pavlovian autonomic conditioning: Some contra-cognitive claims

Published:1988-10 Issue:2 Volume:27 Page:137-151
ISSN:0301-0511
Container-title:Biological Psychology
language:en
Short-container-title:Biological Psychology

Author:

Furedy John J.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology,General Neuroscience

Reference60 articles.

1. Orienting responses and GSR conditioning: A dilemma;Badia;Psychological Review,1970

2. Behavior theory and the models of man;Bandura;American Psychologist,1974

3. There is no convincing evidence for operant or classical conditioning in adult humans;Brewer,1974

4. Stimulus-response continguity in classical aversive conditioning;Champion;Journal of Experimental Psychology,1962

5. Review of Classical conditioning: A symposium;Champion,1966

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A pavlovian in spirit: Richard annells champion (1925–1999);Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science;2000-01

2. Performance but not acquisition of skill learning is severely impaired in the elderly;Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics;1995-03

3. An experimental analysis of classically conditioned nausea during cancer chemotherapy.;Psychosomatic Medicine;1992-11

4. On testing current cognitive theories of Pavlovian conditioning in the human Pavlovian autonomic transswitching preparation;Biological Psychology;1991-10

5. Sharing a common language about conditioning requires accurate characterizations of each others' positions: Reply to Shanks;Biological Psychology;1990-04