Reframing strategic spatial planning as a ‘coproductive trading zone’ between state-led and place-based interests: Reflections from Maryland and Finland-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Reframing strategic spatial planning as a ‘coproductive trading zone’ between state-led and place-based interests: Reflections from Maryland and Finland

Published:2015-01 Issue: Volume:42 Page:113-123
ISSN:0264-8377
Container-title:Land Use Policy
language:en
Short-container-title:Land Use Policy

Author:

Kalliomäki Helka

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Geography, Planning and Development,Forestry

Reference67 articles.

1. The birth of ‘land use planning’ in American urban planning;Akimoto;Plan. Perspect.,2009

2. Shifts in strategic spatial planning? Some evidence from Europe and Australia;Albrechts;Environ. Plan. A,2006

3. More of the same is not enough! How could strategic spatial planning be instrumental in dealing with the challenges ahead?;Albrechts;Environ. Plan. B,2010

4. Reframing strategic spatial planning by using a coproduction perspective;Albrechts;Plan. Theory,2013

5. The fluid scales and scope of UK spatial planning;Allmendinger;Environ. Plan. A,2007

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Innovation districts as strategic urban projects: the emergence of strategic spatial planning for urban innovation;European Planning Studies;2023-06-11

2. E-participation and engagement in urban planning: experiences from the Baltic cities;Urban Research & Practice;2022-05-09

3. Strategic spatial planning in emerging land-use frontiers: evidence from Mozambique;Ecology and Society;2022

4. Strategic land-use planning instruments in tropical regions: state of the art and future research;Journal of Land Use Science;2021-11-02

5. Core-city climate leadership in metropolitan contractual management agreements;European Planning Studies;2021-07-01