Valve-in-valve/valve-in-ring transcatheter mitral valve implantation vs. redo surgical mitral valve replacement for patients with failed bioprosthetic valves or annuloplasty rings: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Author:
Xu Xiufan,
Liu Hong,
Gu Jiaxi,
Li Minghui,
Shao YongfengORCID
Subject
Multidisciplinary
Reference37 articles.
1. Isolated mitral valve surgery risk in 77,836 patients from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database;Chatterjee;Ann. Thorac. Surg.,2013
2. Isolated aortic valve replacement in North America comprising 108,687 patients in 10 years: changes in risks, valve types, and outcomes in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database;Brown;J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.,2009
3. Current indications for transcatheter mitral valve replacement using transcatheter aortic valves: valve-in-valve, valve-in-ring, and valve-in-mitral annulus calcification;Urena;Circulation,2021
4. Thirty-Day Outcomes of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement for Degenerated Mitral Bioprostheses (Valve-in-Valve), Failed Surgical Rings (Valve-in-Ring), and Native Valve With Severe Mitral Annular Calcification (Valve-in-Mitral Annular Calcification) in the United States
5. Outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve replacement for degenerated bioprostheses, failed annuloplasty rings, and mitral annular calcification;Yoon;Eur. Heart J.,2019