The methodological quality of systematic reviews on the treatment of adult major depression needs improvement according to AMSTAR 2: A cross-sectional study-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The methodological quality of systematic reviews on the treatment of adult major depression needs improvement according to AMSTAR 2: A cross-sectional study

Published:2020-09 Issue:9 Volume:6 Page:e04776
ISSN:2405-8440
Container-title:Heliyon
language:en
Short-container-title:Heliyon

Author:

Matthias Katja,Rissling Olesja,Pieper Dawid,Morche Johannes,Nocon Marc,Jacobs Anja,Wegewitz Uta,Schirm Jaqueline,Lorenz Robert C.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference40 articles.

1. Systematic reviews with published protocols compared to those without: more effort, older search;Allers;J. Clin. Epidemiol.,2018

2. Chapter 22: overviews of reviews;Becker,2015

3. Limitations of A Measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (AMSTAR) and suggestions for improvement;Burda;Syst. Rev.,2016

4. Critical appraisal of AMSTAR: challenges, limitations, and potential solutions from the perspective of an assessor;Faggion;BMC Med. Res. Methodol.,2015

5. Systematic reviews published in higher impact clinical journals were of higher quality;Fleming;J. Clin. Epidemiol.,2014

Cited by 50 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Nutritional assessment in acute stroke patients: A systematic review of guidelines and systematic reviews;International Journal of Nursing Studies;2024-10

2. Characteristics and quality of systematic reviews led by Peruvian authors: A scoping review;Heliyon;2024-09

3. Pediatric dentistry systematic reviews using the GRADE approach: methodological study;BMC Oral Health;2024-07-13

4. Deprescribing interventions in older adults: An overview of systematic reviews;PLOS ONE;2024-06-17

5. Inclusion, characteristics and credibility of systematic reviews in doctoral theses: A cross-sectional study of all Medical Faculties in Sweden;2024-06-11