Affiliation:
1. Port Elizabeth Museum PO Box 13147, Humewood 6013, South Africa
2. Department of Ichthyology and Fisheries Science, Rhodes University PO Box 94, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa
Abstract
Abstract
A double-tagging experiment and integrated on-site questionnaire and telephone survey were used to investigate aspects of tag shedding, tag reporting, tag wounds, and tag biofouling for the raggedtooth shark (Carcharias taurus), tagged off the east coast of South Africa. Between 2002 and 2004, 84 juvenile (<1.8 m total length, TL), and 24 adult (>1.8 m TL) C. taurus were double-tagged. Of these, 11 juvenile and six adult double-tagged sharks were recaptured. Significantly, more tags were shed from adult than from juvenile sharks, and there was also a significant difference between the number of anterior and posterior tags shed. Rates of tag reporting were estimated from a survey of 477 randomly selected shore-anglers, and they varied both temporally and spatially from 27% to 100%. In all, 93 tag recaptures were reported in the survey, most (75.3%) with some biofouling. Tag-inflicted damage was reported in 35.5% of recaptured sharks, and the incidence of tag-inflicted damage was greater for disk (77.8%) than for dart tags (25.3%).
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Ecology,Aquatic Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Oceanography
Reference37 articles.
1. Bias and loss of precision due to tag loss in Jolly–Seber estimates for mark-recapture experiments;Arnason;Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences,1981
2. Sedgwicks/ORI/WWF tagging programme: spotted ragged-tooth shark (Carcharias taurus);Bullen,2004
3. Nurse sharks of Big Pine Key: comparative success of three types of external tags;Carrier;Florida Scientist,1985
Cited by
40 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献