Item wording effects in self-report measures and reading achievement: Does removing careless respondents help?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Item wording effects in self-report measures and reading achievement: Does removing careless respondents help?

Published:2022-03 Issue: Volume:72 Page:101126
ISSN:0191-491X
Container-title:Studies in Educational Evaluation
language:en
Short-container-title:Studies in Educational Evaluation

Author:

Bulut Hatice Cigdem^ORCID,Bulut Okan^ORCID

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Education

Reference61 articles.

1. Effects of stem and Likert response option reversals on survey internal consistency: If you feel the need, there is a better alternative to using those negatively- worded stems;Barnette;Educational and Psychological Measurement,2000

2. Response styles in marketing research: A cross-national investigation;Baumbartner;Journal of Marketing Research,2001

3. An IRT mixture model for rating scale confusion associated with negatively worded items in measures of social-emotional learning;Bolt;Applied Measurement in Education,2020

4. Item wording effects in psychological measures: Do early literacy skills matter?;Bulut;Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology,2021

5. A study of polytomous IRT methods and item wording directionality effects on perceived stress items;Cole;Personality and Individual Differences,2019

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A Psychometric Network Analysis Approach for Detecting Item Wording Effects in Self-report Measures across Subgroups;Field Methods;2024-05-11

2. The effects of reverse items on psychometric properties and respondents’ scale scores according to different item reversal strategies;International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education;2024-03-16

3. Who responds inconsistently to mixed-worded scales? Differences by achievement, age group, and gender;Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice;2024-01-02