Is measuring genuine progress at the sub-national level useful?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Is measuring genuine progress at the sub-national level useful?

Published:2008-09 Issue:5 Volume:8 Page:573-581
ISSN:1470-160X
Container-title:Ecological Indicators
language:en
Short-container-title:Ecological Indicators

Author:

Clarke Matthew,Lawn Philip

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,General Decision Sciences

Reference39 articles.

1. Economic growth and its discontents;Abramowitz,1979

2. Anielski, M., 2001. The Alberta GPI Blueprint: The Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) Sustainable Well-Being Accounting System. Pembina Institute for Appropriate Development.

3. Measuring Sustainable Development;Atkinson,1997

4. An Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) for Chile;Castaneda;Ecol. Econ.,1999

5. Widening development prescriptions: policy implications of an Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) for Thailand;Clarke;Int. J. Environ. Sustainable Dev.,2004

Cited by 23 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. An Indicator-Based Approach to Comparative Policy Analysis: Measuring Regional Governance of Migrant Integration;Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice;2024-08-13

2. How firms adjust their SDG adoption in response to COVID-19 outbreak: a regional perspective;Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society;2023-11-01

3. The Inclusive Economy: Criteria, Principles and Ubuntu;2022-08-12

4. Estimating the Genuine Progress Indicator before and during the COVID pandemic in Australia;Ecological Indicators;2022-08

5. Revisiting and evaluation of the index of sustainable economic welfare based on artificial intelligence: data from 30 Chinese provinces from 2003 to 2019;Environment, Development and Sustainability;2022-02-23