Cost comparisons of wet and dry interim storage facilities for PWR spent nuclear fuel in Korea-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Cost comparisons of wet and dry interim storage facilities for PWR spent nuclear fuel in Korea

Published:2011-05 Issue:5 Volume:38 Page:976-981
ISSN:0306-4549
Container-title:Annals of Nuclear Energy
language:en
Short-container-title:Annals of Nuclear Energy

Author:

Cho Chun-Hyung,Kim Tae-Man,Seong Ki-Yeoul,Kim Hyung-Jin,Yoon Jeong-Hyoun

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Nuclear Energy and Engineering

Reference10 articles.

1. International Atomic Energy Agency, 1994. Cost Analysis methodology of Spent Fuel Storage. IAEA-TR 361, IAEA, Vienna.

2. JAI Corporation, 2003. Cost Database for Dry Spent Fuel Storage Systems. JAI-555, Fairfax, VA.

3. Kessler, J., 2009. Cost Estimate for an away-from-reactor Generic Interim Storage Facility (GISF) for Spent Nuclear Fuel. 1018722, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA.

4. Korea Power Engineering Company, INC., 1994. Conceptual Design of Alternative Independent Spent Fuel Storage Facilities. KPC-02-94-03, KOPEC, Yongin, ROK.

5. Lee, J.S., Lovasic, Z., 2009. Costing of Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage. IAEA Nuclear Energy Series No. NF-T-3.5, IAEA, Vienna.

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Global Review of International Nuclear Waste Management;Energies;2023-08-27

2. Optimization of heat removal and radiation protection of dry cask storage for MTR spent nuclear fuel;Annals of Nuclear Energy;2023-06

3. Technical Options and Cost Estimates for Spent Nuclear Fuel Management at the Barakah Nuclear Power Plants;Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations;2021-11-12

4. Spent nuclear fuel storage: What are the relationships between size and cost of the alternatives?;Energy Policy;2021-03

5. VVER-1200 Tipi Nükleer Reaktörün Kullanılmış Yakıtları İçin Depolama Tesisi Modeli Geliştirilmesi ve Maliyet Analizi;Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Sciences and Engineering;2020-05-20