The Comparative Harms of Open and Robotic Prostatectomy in Population Based Samples-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The Comparative Harms of Open and Robotic Prostatectomy in Population Based Samples

Published:2016-02 Issue:2 Volume:195 Page:321-329
ISSN:0022-5347
Container-title:Journal of Urology
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Urology

Author:

O’Neil Brock¹,Koyama Tatsuki²,Alvarez JoAnn²,Conwill Ralph M.³,Albertsen Peter C.⁴,Cooperberg Matthew R.⁵,Goodman Michael⁶,Greenfield Sheldon⁷,Hamilton Ann S.⁸,Hoffman Karen E.⁹,Hoffman Richard M.¹⁰,Kaplan Sherrie H.⁷,Stanford Janet L.¹¹,Stroup Antoinette M.¹²,Paddock Lisa E.¹²,Wu Xiao-Cheng¹³,Stephenson Robert A.¹⁴,Resnick Matthew J.¹¹⁵,Barocas Daniel A.¹,Penson David F.¹¹⁵

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee

2. Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee

3. CEASAR Patient Advocacy Network

4. Division of Urology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut

5. Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco

6. Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia

7. Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine

8. Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California

9. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas

10. Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa

11. Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington

12. New Jersey State Cancer Registry, Trenton, New Jersey

13. Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana

14. Division of Urology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah

15. Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Urology

Reference30 articles.

1. Centralization of radical prostatectomy in the United States;Anderson;J Urol,2013

2. Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy;Farnham;Urology,2006

3. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy;Nelson;J Urol,2007

4. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy;Smith;J Urol,2007

5. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results;Menon;Eur Urol,2007

Cited by 52 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Racial and ethnic disparities in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: testing the physician-level segregated and differential treatment hypotheses;JNCI Cancer Spectrum;2024-07-01

2. Comparing Patient-reported Functional Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy in Historical and Contemporary Practice;Journal of Urology;2023-11

3. EDITORIAL COMMENT;Urology;2023-04

4. Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Evolutionary Parallels to Breast Cancer Treatment;Journal of Urology;2023-01

5. Patients Regret Their Choice of Therapy Significantly Less Frequently after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy as Opposed to Open Radical Prostatectomy: Patient-Reported Results of the Multicenter Cross-Sectional IMPROVE Study;Cancers;2022-10-30