Incidence of Extraprostatic Extension at Radical Prostatectomy with Pure Gleason Score 3 + 3 = 6 (Grade Group 1) Cancer: Implications for Whether Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer Should be Renamed "Not Cancer" and for Selection Criteria for Active Surveillance-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Incidence of Extraprostatic Extension at Radical Prostatectomy with Pure Gleason Score 3 + 3 = 6 (Grade Group 1) Cancer: Implications for Whether Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer Should be Renamed "Not Cancer" and for Selection Criteria for Active Surveillance

Published:2018-06 Issue:6 Volume:199 Page:1482-1487
ISSN:0022-5347
Container-title:Journal of Urology
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Urology

Author:

Hassan Oudai¹,Han Misop¹,Zhou Amy¹,Paulk Adina¹,Sun Yue¹,Al-Harbi Abdullah¹,Alrajjal Ahmed¹,Baptista dos Santos Filipa¹,Epstein Jonathan I.¹

Affiliation:

1. Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Urology

Reference27 articles.

1. Addressing overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer: a prescription for change;Esserman;Lancet Oncol,2014

2. Should we really consider Gleason 6 prostate cancer?;Nickel;BJU Int,2012

3. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma;Epstein;Am J Surg Pathol,2005

4. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: definition of grading patterns and proposal for a new grading system;Epstein;Am J Surg Pathol,2016

5. Prostate cancer grading: a decade after the 2005 modified Gleason grading system;Kryvenko;Arch Pathol Lab Med,2016

Cited by 31 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Growth Patterns of Prostate Cancers Undetected by Prostate 3T Multiparametric MRI;In Vivo;2024

2. Risk of Biochemical Recurrence in Patients With Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer With Extraprostatic Extension Treated With Radical Prostatectomy;Journal of Urology;2023-12-18

3. Gleason score 3+3=6 prostatic adenocarcinoma is not benign and the current debate is unhelpful to clinicians and patients;Pathology;2023-11

4. Point-Counterpoint: Gleason Score 6/Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer Should Be Renamed as “Non-cancer” to Improve Public Health: A Wrong Idea From a Pathologist’s Perspective;Journal of Urology;2023-07

5. Renaming Grade Group 1 Prostate “Cancer” From a Pathology Perspective: A Call for Multidisciplinary Discussion;Advances in Anatomic Pathology;2023-04-17