Sexual Function Reported by Japanese and American Men-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Sexual Function Reported by Japanese and American Men

Published:2008-01 Issue:1 Volume:179 Page:245-249
ISSN:0022-5347
Container-title:Journal of Urology
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Urology

Author:

Namiki Shunichi¹²,Kwan Lorna¹,Kagawa-Singer Marjorie¹,Saito Seiichi²,Terai Akito³,Satoh Takefumi⁴,Baba Shiro⁴,Arai Yoichi²,Litwin Mark S.¹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, Departments of Health Services and Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California

2. Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan

3. Departments of Urology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Okayama, Japan

4. Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Urology

Reference18 articles.

1. Quality of life after treatment for localized prostate cancer: differences based on treatment modality;Davis;J Urol,2001

2. Treatment of erectile dysfunction following therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: patient reported use and outcomes from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study;Stephenson;J Urol,2005

3. Use of medications or devices for erectile dysfunction among long-term prostate cancer treatment survivors: potential influence of sexual motivation and/or indifference;Miller;Urology,2006

4. Drivers and barriers to seeking treatment for erectile dysfunction: a comparison of six countries;Shabsigh;BJU Int,2004

5. Sexual, psychological and dyadic qualities of the prostate cancer ‘couple’;Soloway;BJU Int,2005

Cited by 35 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Patient-reported outcomes before treatment for localized prostate cancer: are there differences among countries? Data from the True North Global Registry;BMC Urology;2023-11-03

2. Quality of life after non‐nerve‐sparing, robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy;Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology;2023-10-18

3. Comparing pentafecta outcomes between nerve sparing and non nerve sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a propensity score-matched study;Scientific Reports;2023-09-22

4. Editorial Comment to Evaluation of sexual function after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy: A farewell to IIEF questionnaire;International Journal of Urology;2023-08-22

5. Postoperative functional and cancer control evaluation of conventional and Retzius‐sparing robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy: Comparison of selected cases by propensity score matching;The Prostate;2023-03-06