Do we measure novelty when we analyze unusual combinations of cited references? A validation study of bibliometric novelty indicators based on F1000Prime data-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Do we measure novelty when we analyze unusual combinations of cited references? A validation study of bibliometric novelty indicators based on F1000Prime data

Published:2019-11 Issue:4 Volume:13 Page:100979
ISSN:1751-1577
Container-title:Journal of Informetrics
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Informetrics

Author:

Bornmann Lutz,Tekles Alexander,Zhang Helena H.^ORCID,Ye Fred Y.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications

Reference59 articles.

1. A gentle introduction to Stata;Acock,2018

2. Interdisciplinary Research: Methodologies for Identification and Assessment. Do we know what we are measuring?;Adams,2016

3. Guide to longitudinal program impact evaluation;Angeles,2014

4. Revolutionizing peer review?;Anon;Nature Neuroscience,2005

5. Providing meaningful information: Part B—Bibliometric analysis;Belter,2018

Cited by 38 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. An effective framework for measuring the novelty of scientific articles through integrated topic modeling and cloud model;Journal of Informetrics;2024-11

2. An integrated indicator for evaluating scientific papers: considering academic impact and novelty;Scientometrics;2024-09-13

3. Unveiling novelty evolution in the field of library and information science in China;The Electronic Library;2024-09-11

4. Corrigendum to “Do we measure novelty when we analyze unusual combinations of cited references? A validation study of bibliometric novelty indicators based on F1000Prime data” [Journal of Informetrics 13/4 (2019) 100979];Journal of Informetrics;2024-08

5. How to measure interdisciplinary research? A systemic design for the model of measurement;Scientometrics;2024-07-13