Two-tier voting: Measuring inequality and specifying the inverse power problem-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Two-tier voting: Measuring inequality and specifying the inverse power problem

Published:2016-01 Issue: Volume:79 Page:40-45
ISSN:0165-4896
Container-title:Mathematical Social Sciences
language:en
Short-container-title:Mathematical Social Sciences

Author:

Weber Matthias

Funder

The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO)

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,General Psychology,General Social Sciences,Sociology and Political Science

Reference26 articles.

1. The inverse Banzhaf problem;Alon;Soc. Choice Welf.,2010

2. On the measurement of inequality;Atkinson;J. Econom. Theory,1970

3. Baldwin, R., Widgrén, M., 2004. Winners and losers under various dual majority rules for the EU Council of Ministers. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 4450.

4. Fair Representation: Meeting the Ideal of One Man, One Vote;Balinski,2001

5. A comparison between the methods of apportionment using power indices: The case of the us presidential elections;Barthélémy;Ann. Econ. Stat.,2011

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Choosing the rules: Preferences over voting systems for assemblies of representatives;Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization;2020-06

2. The Inherited Inequality: How Demographic Aging and Pension Reforms can Change the Intergenerational Transmission of Wealth;German Economic Review;2019-12-01

3. Correlation and Inequality in Weighted Majority Voting Games;Deprivation, Inequality and Polarization;2019

4. Voting Power and the Public Good Index: Thoughts;SSRN Electronic Journal;2018

5. An innovative majority voting mechanism in interactive social network clustering;Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics;2017-06-19