Comparative sensitivity of solid phase versus PEG enhancement assays for detection and identification of RBC antibodies-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparative sensitivity of solid phase versus PEG enhancement assays for detection and identification of RBC antibodies

Published:2006-08 Issue:1 Volume:35 Page:19-23
ISSN:1473-0502
Container-title:Transfusion and Apheresis Science
language:en
Short-container-title:Transfusion and Apheresis Science

Author:

Dwyre Denis M.,Erickson Yasuko,Heintz Mary,Elbert Charlene,Strauss Ronald G.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Hematology

Reference23 articles.

1. Optimizing pretransfusion antibody detection and identification: a parallel, blinded comparison of tube PEG, solid-phase, and automated methods;Bunker;Transfusion,2001

2. Comparison of manual gel technology vs tube technology (abstract);Hawk;Transfusion,2004

3. Antibody detection and identification: gel technology versus tube method (abstract);Blackburn;Transfusion,2002

4. Comparison of a solid phase and polyethylene glycol (PEG) IAT method in a large transfusion service (abstract);Issitt;Transfusion,1997

5. Comparison study between routine tube test (LISS), PEG tube test, gel technology and solid phase red cell adherence assays (abstract);Reilly;Transfusion,1997

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Comparison of the solid-phase red cell adherence assay and tube method for detection and identification of red blood cell antibodies;American Journal of Clinical Pathology;2024-04-12

2. The impact of an antibody investigation algorithm emphasizing specificity on reducing potential false‐positive warm autoantibody detection at a Canadian tertiary care centre;Vox Sanguinis;2023-10-24

3. Immunohematologic aspects of alloimmunization and alloantibody detection: A focus on pregnancy and hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn;Transfusion and Apheresis Science;2020-10

4. Pretransfusion Testing;Clinical Principles of Transfusion Medicine;2018