Conceptual issues in theorising anorexia nervosa: Mere matters of semantics?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Conceptual issues in theorising anorexia nervosa: Mere matters of semantics?

Published:2003-11 Issue:6 Volume:26 Page:585-598
ISSN:0160-2527
Container-title:International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
language:en
Short-container-title:International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

Author:

Beumont Pierre,Carney Terry

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Law,Psychiatry and Mental health,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference52 articles.

1. Re DM 2002. Re DM. Unreported Statement of Reasons of the Victorian Mental Health Review Board, 22 February 2002 (Newby & Wood, McSherry dissenting).

2. Re EC 2001. Re EC. Unreported Statement of Reasons of the Victorian Mental Health Review Board, 17 July 2001 (Meadows, Newby & Gidley).

3. Re EC 2001. Re EC. Unreported Statement of Reasons of the Victorian Mental Health Review Board, 5 June 2001 (Hopkins, Mead & Lush).

4. Re EF 1996. In the review of EF an Involuntary Patient at Royal Melbourne Hospital (1996) 2 MHRBD (Vic) 346.

5. Re KJ 2001. Re KJ. Unreported Statement of Reasons of the Victorian Mental Health Review Board, 14 August 2001 (Meadows, Gallois & Gidley).

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. How should the law determine capacity to refuse treatment for anorexia?;International Journal of Law and Psychiatry;2019-05

2. The Ethics of Deep Brain Stimulation for the Treatment of Anorexia Nervosa;Neuroethics;2015-09-24

3. Anorexia Nervosa: The Diagnosis;Journal of Bioethical Inquiry;2013-12-24

4. The Challenge of Managing Severely Ill Patients with Anorexia Nervosa in Ireland;Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine;2012

5. Anorexia: A Role for Law in Therapy?1;Psychiatry, Psychology and Law;2009-03