1. Alliat, I., Florisson, O., Lovesmith, G.B., 2009. The value of the existing natural gas system for hydrogen, the sustainable future energy carrier: progress obtained in the NATURALHY-project, 〈https://www.coleurope.eu/content/studyprogrammes/eco/conferences/Files/Papers/Florisson_The_NATURALHY_Project.pdf〉.
2. Barilo, N.U.S. , 2017a. Department of Energy, Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2017 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, Fuel Cell Technologies Office, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, June 13-15, 2017. 〈https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review17/scs019_barilo_2017_o.pdf〉; (Accessed 3 December 2017).
3. Barilo, N.U.S., 2017b. Department of Energy, Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program. Hydrogen Safety Panel, Safety Knowledge Tools and First Responder Training Resources, Annual Progress Report, section VIII.6. Fuel Cell Technologies Office, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC. 〈https://www.h2tools.org/sites/default/files/viii_6_barilo_2017.pdf〉.
4. Baronas, J., Achtelik, G. et al., 2016. Joint Agency Staff Report on Assembly Bill 8. Annual Assessment of Time and Cost Needed to Attain 100 Hydrogen Refueling Stations in California. California Energy Commission. Publication Number: CEC-600-2017-002. 〈http://www.energy.ca.gov/2017publications/CEC-600-2017-002/CEC-600-2017-002.pdf〉 (Accessed 29 January 2017).
5. Economic analysis of near-term California hydrogen infrastructure;Brown;Int. J. Hydrog. Energy,2013