Response to: Commentary on: Bright et al. (2018) Internal validation of STRmix™ – A multi laboratory response to PCAST, Forensic Science International: Genetics, 34: 11

Response to: Commentary on: Bright et al. (2018) Internal validation of STRmix™ – A multi laboratory response to PCAST, Forensic Science International: Genetics, 34: 11–24

Published:2020-01 Issue: Volume:44 Page:102198
ISSN:1872-4973
Container-title:Forensic Science International: Genetics
language:en
Short-container-title:Forensic Science International: Genetics

Author:

Buckleton John S.,Bright Jo-Anne,Ciecko Anne,Kruijver Maarten,Mallinder Benjamin,Magee Alan,Malsom Simon,Moretti Tamyra,Weitz Steven,Bille Todd,Noël Sarah,Oefelein Rachel H.,Peck Brian,Kalafut Timothy,Taylor Duncan A.

Funder

US National Institute of Justice

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Genetics,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference57 articles.

1. Commentary on: Bright et al. (2018) internal validation of STRmix; a multi laboratory response to PCAST;McNevin;Forensic Sci. Int. Genet.,2019

2. Internal validation of STRmix; a multi laboratory response to PCAST;Bright;Forensic Sci. Int. Genet.,2018

3. 54 AppDC 46, 293Fed 1013 (1923);Frye v The United States of America,1923

4. Daubert et al. v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc., 509 US 579 (1993). 1993.

5. Kumho Tire Co. Ltd et al. v. Carmichael et al. In: Court USS, editor. 526 US 1371999.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Comparison of Likelihood Ratios from Probabilistic Genotyping for Two-Person Mixtures across Different Assays and Instruments;Forensic Sciences;2024-09-02

2. Interpretation and reporting of mixed DNA profiles by seven forensic laboratories in the UK and Ireland;Forensic Science International: Genetics;2022-05

3. Proposed Framework for Comparison of Continuous Probabilistic Genotyping Systems amongst Different Laboratories;Forensic Sciences;2021-06-10