Ensuring the rigor in systematic reviews: Part 2, preparation is key: The question and the protocol-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Ensuring the rigor in systematic reviews: Part 2, preparation is key: The question and the protocol

Published:2020-11 Issue:6 Volume:49 Page:965-966
ISSN:0147-9563
Container-title:Heart & Lung
language:en
Short-container-title:Heart & Lung

Author:

Brackett Alexandria,Batten Janene

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Reference8 articles.

1. Systematic reviews and meta-analytic techniques;Baird;Semin Pediatr Surg,2018

2. Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the prospero registry;Borah;BMJ Open,2017

3. Cochrane Collaboration. (2019). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Retrieved February 27, 2020, 2020, from https://training.cochrane.org/handbook

4. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies;Grant;Health Info Libr J,2009

5. Tips for improving the writing and reporting quality of systematic, scoping, and narrative reviews;Horsley;J Continuing Educ Health Profess,2019

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Selection process for admission to an academic nursing programme – A meta-synthesis;Nurse Education Today;2022-09

2. Ensuring rigor in systematic reviews: Part 7, critical appraisal of systematic review quality;Heart & Lung;2022-05

3. Ensuring rigor in systematic reviews: Part 6, reporting guidelines;Heart & Lung;2022-03

4. Ensuring Rigor in systematic reviews: Part 5, quality appraisal, data extraction, synthesis;Heart & Lung;2021-09

5. Ensuring the rigor in systematic reviews: Part 3, the value of the search;Heart & Lung;2021-03