Decision making in the absence of successful fact finding: theory and experimental evidence on adversarial versus inquisitorial systems of adjudication-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Decision making in the absence of successful fact finding: theory and experimental evidence on adversarial versus inquisitorial systems of adjudication

Published:2004-03 Issue:1 Volume:24 Page:89-105
ISSN:0144-8188
Container-title:International Review of Law and Economics
language:en
Short-container-title:International Review of Law and Economics

Author:

Block Michael K,Parker Jeffrey S

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Law,Economics and Econometrics,Finance

Reference12 articles.

1. An experimental comparison of adversarial versus inquisitorial procedural regimes;Block;American Law and Economics Review,2000

2. Advocates;Dewatripont;Journal of Political Economy,1999

3. Burdens of proof in civil litigation: An economic perspective;Hay;Journal of Legal Studies,1997

4. James, F., Hazard, G. C., & Leubsdorf, J. (2001). Civil procedure (5th ed.). New York: Foundation Press.

5. Kobayashi, B. H. (1996). Case selection, external effects, and the trial/settlement decision. In D. A. Robinson (Ed.), Dispute resolution. JAI Press.

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Legal-Lay Discourse and Procedural Justice in Family and County Courts;2024-03-26

2. Welfare and competition in expert advice markets;Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization;2024-03

3. Deterrence, settlement, and litigation under adversarial versus inquisitorial systems;Public Choice;2022-11-24

4. Deterrence, Settlement, and Litigation Under Adversarial Versus Inquisitorial Systems;SSRN Electronic Journal;2021

5. On the role of emotions in experimental litigation contests;International Review of Law and Economics;2019-03