Author:
Otake Hiromasa,Kubo Takashi,Takahashi Hachidai,Shinke Toshiro,Okamura Takayuki,Hibi Kiyoshi,Nakazawa Gaku,Morino Yoshihiro,Shite Junya,Fusazaki Tetsuya,Kozuma Ken,Ioji Tetsuya,Kaneda Hideaki,Akasaka Takashi
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Reference24 articles.
1. Relationship between intravascular ultrasound guidance and clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stents: the assessment of dual antiplatelet therapy with drug-eluting stents (ADAPT-DES) study;Witzenbichler;Circulation,2014
2. Natural consequence of post-intervention stent malapposition, thrombus, tissue prolapse, and dissection assessed by optical coherence tomography at mid-term follow-up;Kawamori;Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging,2013
3. Optical coherence tomography imaging during percutaneous coronary intervention impacts physician decision-making: ILUMIEN I study;Wijns;Eur Heart J,2015
4. Optical frequency domain imaging vs. intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention (OPINION trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial;Kubo;J Cardiol,2016
5. Kubo T, Shinke T, Okamura T, et al. Optical frequency domain imaging vs. intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention (OPINION trial): one-year angiographic and clinical results. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/3896147/Optical-frequency-domain-imaging-vs-intravascular?searchresult=1. Accessed August 31, 2017.
Cited by
71 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献