Radical pluralism, classificatory norms and the legitimacy of species classifications-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Radical pluralism, classificatory norms and the legitimacy of species classifications

Published:2019-02 Issue: Volume:73 Page:27-34
ISSN:1369-8486
Container-title:Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
language:en
Short-container-title:Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences

Author:

Conix Stijn^ORCID

Funder

Arts and Humanities Research Council

Research Foundation - Flanders

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,History,General Medicine

Reference54 articles.

1. What are species and why does it matter? Anopheline taxonomy and the transmission of malaria;Attenborough,2015

3. Species as ranked taxa;Baum;Systematic Biology,2009

4. Homeostasis, species, and higher taxa;Boyd,1999

5. Kinds as the “workmanship of men”: Realism, constructivism, and natural kinds;Boyd,2000

Cited by 33 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Why use generic language in science?;The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science;2024-03-12

2. Species;KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION;2024

4. Last Chance Saloons for Natural Kind Realism;American Philosophical Quarterly;2023-01-01