Assessment of Clinical Reasoning Competence in Urology with the Script Concordance Test: an Exploratory Study Across Two Sites from Different Countries-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Assessment of Clinical Reasoning Competence in Urology with the Script Concordance Test: an Exploratory Study Across Two Sites from Different Countries

Published:2002-03 Issue:3 Volume:41 Page:227-233
ISSN:0302-2838
Container-title:European Urology
language:en
Short-container-title:European Urology

Author:

Sibert Louis,Charlin Bernard,Corcos Jacques,Gagnon Robert,Lechevallier Joel,Grise Philippe

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Urology

Reference19 articles.

1. Norman GR. Defining competence: a methodological review. In: Neufeld VR, Norman GR, editors. Assessing clinical competence, vol. 7. New York: Springer, 1985. p. 15–35.

2. Elaborated knowledge: a key to successful diagnostic thinking;Bordage;Acad. Med.,1994

3. Elstein AS, Shulman LS, Sprafka SA. Medical problem-solving: an analysis of clinical reasoning. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 1978.

4. The clinical reasoning of randomly selected physicians in medical general practice;Barrows;Clin. Invest. Med.,1982

5. Expertise: reorganizing and refining knowledge for use;Feltovich;Prof. Educ. Res. Notes,1983

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Evaluating the Clinical Reasoning of Student Health Professionals in Placement and Simulation Settings: A Systematic Review;International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health;2022-01-14

2. Assessing clinical reasoning in optometry using the script concordance test;Clinical and Experimental Optometry;2016-05-01

3. Students' Perceptions of the Script Concordance Test and Its Impact on Their Learning Behavior: A Mixed Methods Study;Journal of Veterinary Medical Education;2015-03

4. Assessing intraoperative judgment using script concordance testing through the gynecology continuum of practice;Medical Teacher;2014-05-12

5. Analyzing Script Concordance Test Scoring Methods and Items by Difficulty and Type;Teaching and Learning in Medicine;2014-04