Screening for obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome: Subjective and objective factors

Author:

Friedman Michael12,Wilson Meghan N.2,Pulver Tanya2,Pandya Hemang2,Joseph Ninos J.2,Lin Hsin-Ching3,Chang Hsueh-Wen4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL

2. Department of Otolaryngology, Advanced Center for Specialty Care, Advocate, Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL

3. Department of Otolaryngology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Kaohsiung Medical Center, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

4. Department of Biological Sciences, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of the Berlin Questionnaire and the Obstructive Sleep Apnea/Hypopnea Syndrome (OSAHS) score for individually predicting a diagnosis of OSAHS, and to propose a method for OSAHS screening incorporating objective and subjective factors. Study Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: Tertiary care center. Methods: Charts were reviewed from 223 consecutive patients for whom complete data regarding the Berlin questionnaire, OSAHS score (Friedman tongue position + tonsil size + body mass index grade), Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and visual analog scale for snoring were obtained prior to polysomnography (PSG). Sensitivity and specificity were determined for the Berlin questionnaire and OSAHS score for predicting an apnea hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5. Patient data were subjected to multivariate stepwise discriminant analysis and used to construct a screening system based on the Fisher's linear classification equation. Results were cross-validated by PSG findings. Results: In predicting an AHI ≥ 5, the sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were 0.615 and 0.226 for the Berlin questionnaire, 0.863 and 0.468 for OSAHS score, and 0.82 and 0.834 for our predictive equation. When applied case-wise to the study population, this equation correctly predicted 82.5 percent of diagnoses. Accuracy was highest for severe OSAHS (87.4%) and lowest for mild disease (77.0%). Sensitivity was lowest for mild OSAHS (0.50). Conclusions: Neither the Berlin questionnaire nor the OSAHS score alone was both highly sensitive and specific for diagnosing OSAHS. By incorporating subjective and objective metrics into a single predictive equation, sensitivity and specificity were maximized, and 82.5 percent of diagnoses were accurately predicted.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Otorhinolaryngology,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3