A Prospective Randomized Single-Blind Trial Comparing Ultrasonic Scalpel Tonsillectomy with Tonsillectomy by Blunt Dissection in a Pediatric Age Group

Author:

Oko Michael O.12,Ganly Ian12,Loughran Sean12,Clement W. Andrew12,Young David13,Geddes Neil K.12

Affiliation:

1. Glasgow, United Kingdom

2. Department of Otolaryngology, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Yorkhill

3. Department of Statistics and Modelling Science, University of Strathclyde

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if there was a difference in postoperative pain and dietary intake when comparing ultrasonic scalpel (US) with blunt dissection tonsillectomy (BD) in children. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective single-blind randomized controlled trial comparing US and BD tonsillectomy in children aged between 5 and 13 years who undergo tonsillectomy for recurrent acute tonsillitis in a specialized pediatric hospital. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-two children were enrolled. Ninety-three (76%) patients completed dietary and pain scales. Pain was significantly greater in the US group on postoperative days 1 and 3 ( P = 0.0466, P = 0.0084) and overall ( P = 0.0003). Dietary intake scores were significantly better in the US group on days 1, 5, 7, and 9, however, these scores were inconsistent with dietary intake scores declining in both groups throughout the study. Blood loss was statistically significantly greater in the BD group (33.1 ml vs 3.0 ml, P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences for all other observed outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: US tonsillectomy causes significantly more pain overall and on postoperative days 1 and 3 when compared to BD tonsillectomy. US tonsillectomy causes less intraoperative blood loss, the clinical significance of which is questionable. SIGNIFICANCE: US tonsillectomy appears to cause more postoperative pain than BD tonsillectomy in children aged 5 to 13 years undergoing tonsillectomy for recurrent acute tonsillitis.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Otorhinolaryngology,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3