Safety and Outcomes of Balloon Catheter Sinusotomy: A Multicenter 24-Week Analysis in 115 Patients

Author:

Bolger William E.12,Brown Christopher L.13,Church Christopher A.14,Goldberg Andrew N.15,Karanfilov Boris16,Kuhn Frederick A.17,Levine Howard L.18,Sillers Michael J.19,Vaughan Winston C.110,Weiss Raymond L.111

Affiliation:

1. Bethesda, MD; Melbourne, Australia; Loma Linda, CA; San Francisco, CA; Columbus, OH; Savannah, GA; Cleveland, OH; Birmingham, AL; Palo Alto, CA; and Biloxi, MS

2. Maryland Sinus Center, Bethesda

3. Sandringham District Memorial Hospital

4. Bayside Network, Melbourne; Loma Linda University

5. University of California-San Francisco

6. Ohio Sinus Institute, Columbus

7. Georgia Nasal and Sinus Institute, Savannah

8. Cleveland Nasal, Sinus and Sleep Center

9. Alabama Nasal and Sinus Center, Birmingham

10. California Sinus Institute (Dr Vaughan), Palo Alto

11. Sinus Center of the South, Biloxi

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to further evaluate the safety and effectiveness of balloon catheter devices to dilate obstructed sinus ostia/perform sinusotomy. METHODS: Through a prospective, multicenter evaluation, safety was assessed by rate of adverse events, patency was determined by endoscopic examination, and sinus symptoms were determined by the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT 20). RESULTS: At the conclusion of the 24-week analysis, endoscopy determined that the sinusotomy was patent in 80.5% (247 of 307) sinuses and nonpatent in 1.6% (5 of 307), and could not determine ostial patency status in 17.9% (55 of 307). Of the ostia visualized on endoscopy, 98% were patent (247 of 252), while 2% (5 of 252) were considered nonpatent. SNOT 20 scores showed consistent symptomatic improvement over baseline. Revision treatment was required in 3 sinuses (3 of 307 sinuses, 0.98%) in 3 patients (3 of 109 patients, 2.75%). CONCLUSION: Balloon catheter technology appears safe and effective in relieving ostial obstruction. Patients were pleased and indicated that they experienced symptomatic improvement.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Otorhinolaryngology,Surgery

Cited by 182 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3