Author:
Montesino-Semper Manuel F.,Jimenez-Calvo Jesus M.,Cabases Juan M.,Sanchez-Iriso Eduardo,Hualde-Alfaro Antonio,García-García Diego
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology,Reproductive Medicine
Reference31 articles.
1. A cost-utility analysis of tension-free vaginal tape versus colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence;Manca;BJOG,2003
2. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of tension-free vaginal tape for treatment of urinary stress incontinence;Cody;Health Technol Assess,2003
3. Cost-effectiveness analysis of open colposuspension versus laparoscopic colposuspension in the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence;Dumville;BJOG,2006
4. Single-center retrospective study of the technique, safety, and 12-month efficacy of the MiniArc single-Incision sling: a new minimally invasive procedure for treatment of female SUI;Moore;Surg Technol Int,2009
5. Is Burch colposuspension ever cost-effective compared with tension-free vaginal tape for stress incontinence?;Wu;Am J Obstet Gynecol,2007
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献