More Nomograms or Better Evidence of Efficacy: What Do We Need in Urologic Oncology?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

More Nomograms or Better Evidence of Efficacy: What Do We Need in Urologic Oncology?

Published:2008-07 Issue:1 Volume:54 Page:11-12
ISSN:0302-2838
Container-title:European Urology
language:en
Short-container-title:European Urology

Author:

Catto James W.F.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Urology

Reference10 articles.

1. A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer;Kattan;J Natl Cancer Inst,1998

2. Nomograms for bladder cancer;Shariat;Eur Urol,2008

3. Available from: www.nomogram.org. Accessed 17 January 2008.

4. Multi-institutional validation of a new renal cancer-specific survival nomogram;Karakiewicz;J Clin Oncol,2007

5. Artificial intelligence in predicting bladder cancer outcome: a comparison of neuro-fuzzy modeling and artificial neural networks;Catto;Clin Cancer Res,2003

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Nomograms in Urologic Oncology: Lights and Shadows;Journal of Clinical Medicine;2021-03-02

2. The R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometric Nomogram Cannot Accurately Predict Malignancy or Aggressiveness of Small Renal Masses Amenable to Partial Nephrectomy;Clinical Genitourinary Cancer;2014-10

3. The pursuit of the “perfect” biomarker in prostate cancer;Canadian Urological Association Journal;2011-12-01

4. Original Gleason System Versus 2005 ISUP Modified Gleason System: The Importance of Indicating Which System Is Used in the Patient’s Pathology and Clinical Reports;European Urology;2010-09

5. Predicting individual outcomes after radical cystectomy: an external validation of current nomograms;BJU International;2009-12-11