Gleason Score 3 + 5 or 5 + 3 versus 4 + 4 Prostate Cancer: The Risk of Death-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Gleason Score 3 + 5 or 5 + 3 versus 4 + 4 Prostate Cancer: The Risk of Death

Published:2016-06 Issue:6 Volume:69 Page:976-979
ISSN:0302-2838
Container-title:European Urology
language:en
Short-container-title:European Urology

Author:

Huynh Mai Anh,Chen Ming-Hui,Wu Jing,Braccioforte Michelle H.,Moran Brian J.,D’Amico Anthony V.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Urology

Reference10 articles.

1. Gleason grading and prognostic factors in carcinoma of the prostate;Humphrey;Mod Pathol,2004

2. Humphrey P, Epstein J, Amin M, Delahunt B, Egevad L, Srigley J. Paper presented at: International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Gleason Grading Consensus Meeting; January 19, 2015, 2014; Chicago, IL.

3. A contemporary prostate cancer grading system: a validated alternative to the Gleason score;Epstein;Eur Urol,2016

4. Gleason 5 + 4 has worse oncological and pathological outcomes compared with Gleason 4 + 5: significance of Gleason 5 pattern;Lim;Ann Surg Oncol,2013

5. AJCC cancer staging manual;Greene,2002

Cited by 49 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Prognosis of Gleason score 8 prostatic adenocarcinoma in needle biopsies: a nationwide population-based study;Virchows Archiv;2024-04-29

2. Do Subgroup Evaluations Provide Additional Contributions to Biochemical Recurrence in Grade Group 4 and 5 Patients? A Multicenter Study by the Turkish Urooncology Association Prostate Cancer Working Group;The Bulletin of Urooncology;2024-04-04

3. Prognosis of Gleason Score 9–10 Prostatic Adenocarcinoma in Needle Biopsies: A Nationwide Population-based Study;European Urology Oncology;2023-11

4. Appropriateness of Prostate Cancer Prevention and Screening Recommendations Obtained From ChatGPT-4;2023-05-22

5. Clonal relationships of adjacent Gleason pattern 3 and Gleason pattern 5 lesions in Gleason Scores 3+5=8 and 5+3=8;Human Pathology;2022-12