What Does It Take to Change an Editor’s Mind? Identifying Minimally Important Difference Thresholds for Peer Reviewer Rating Scores of Scientific Articles-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

What Does It Take to Change an Editor’s Mind? Identifying Minimally Important Difference Thresholds for Peer Reviewer Rating Scores of Scientific Articles

Published:2018-09 Issue:3 Volume:72 Page:314-318.e2
ISSN:0196-0644
Container-title:Annals of Emergency Medicine
language:en
Short-container-title:Annals of Emergency Medicine

Author:

Callaham Michael,John Leslie K.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Emergency Medicine

Reference10 articles.

1. Development of the Review Quality Instrument (RQI) for assessing peer reviews of manuscripts;Van Rooyen;J Clin Epidemiol,1999

2. Minimal clinically important difference: defining what really matters to patients;McGlothlin;JAMA,2014

3. When is cancer pain mild, moderate, or severe? grading pain severity by its interference with function;Serlin;Pain,1995

4. Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method;Becker;Behav Sci,1964

5. Changes of heart: the switch-value method for assessing value uncertainty;John;Med Decis Making,2010

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. When “the more the better”? Mindfulness enhances the effect of the number of displayed product features in short video ADs on purchase intention;International Journal of Market Research;2024-08-14

2. Assessment of bias in scoring of AI-based radiotherapy segmentation and planning studies using modified TRIPOD and PROBAST guidelines as an example;Radiotherapy and Oncology;2024-05

3. Effect of revealing authors’ conflicts of interests in peer review: randomized controlled trial;BMJ;2019-11-06

4. Framing and Anchoring—In Journals and in Medicine;Annals of Emergency Medicine;2019-05