Comparison of radial versus femoral access using hemostatic devices following percutaneous coronary intervention-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparison of radial versus femoral access using hemostatic devices following percutaneous coronary intervention

Published:2021-05 Issue:3 Volume:73 Page:382-384
ISSN:0019-4832
Container-title:Indian Heart Journal
language:en
Short-container-title:Indian Heart Journal

Author:

Rana Naresh,Vijayvergiya Rajesh^ORCID,Kasinadhuni Ganesh,Khanal Suraj,Panda Prashant

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference15 articles.

1. Bleeding avoidance strategies during percutaneous coronary interventions;Singh;J Am Coll Cardiol,2015

2. Incidence, prognostic impact, and influence of antithrombotic therapy on access and nonaccess site bleeding in percutaneous coronary intervention;Verheugt;JACC Cardiovasc Interv,2011

3. Minimizing femoral artery access complications during percutaneous coronary intervention: a comprehensive review;Lee;Cathet Cardiovasc Interv,2014

4. Comparison between radial approach and femoral approach with vascular closure devices on the occurrence of access-site complications and periprocedural bleeding after percutaneous coronary procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Rigattieri;J Invasive Cardiol,2016

5. Meta-analysis of randomized trials on the efficacy of vascular closure devices after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty;Biancari;Am Heart J,2010

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Comment: Comparison of radial versus femoral access using hemostatic devices following percutaneous coronary intervention;Indian Heart Journal;2021-07

2. Reply to letter to Editor written by Deora S, et al, regarding publication entitled “Rana N, Vijayvergiya R, Kasinadhuni G, et al. Comparison of radial versus femoral access using hemostatic devices following percutaneous coronary intervention. Indian Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2021.04.006”;Indian Heart Journal;2021-07