1. Safety performance indicator for alcohol in road accidents: international comparison, validity and data quality;Assum;Accident Analysis and Prevention,2010
2. Crime and punishment: an economic approach;Becker;Journal of Political Economy,1968
3. Bickel, P., Friedrich, R., Burgess, A., Fagiani, P., Hunt, A., De Jong, G., Laird, J., Lieb, C., Lindberg, G., Mackie, P., Navrud, S., Odgaard, T., Ricci, A., Shires, J., & Tavasszy, L. (2006). Proposal for harmonised guidelines. Deliverable 5, Developing Harmonised European Approaches for Transport Costing and Project Assessment (HEATCO), Project funded by the European Commission under the Transport RTD Programme of the 6th Framework Programme, Institut für Energiewirtschaft und Rationelle Energieanwendung (IER), Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart.
4. Blencowe, T., Pehrsson, A., & Lillsunde, P. (2010). Analytical evaluation of oral fluid screening devices and preceding selection procedures. Deliverable D 3.2.2, Driving under the Influence of Drugs, Alcohol and Medicines (DRUID), Integrated Project funded by the European Commission under “1.6. Sustainable Development, Global Change and Ecosystem” of the 6th Framework Programme (Project No. TREN-05-FP6TR-S07.61320-518404-DRUID). National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki. Available from: http://www.druid-project.eu/.
5. Being “at fault” in traffic crashes: does cannabis, cocaine, or polydrug abuse make a difference?;Chipman;Injury Prevention,2003