An axiomatic analysis of concordance–discordance relations-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

An axiomatic analysis of concordance–discordance relations

Published:2009-12 Issue:2 Volume:199 Page:468-477
ISSN:0377-2217
Container-title:European Journal of Operational Research
language:en
Short-container-title:European Journal of Operational Research

Author:

Bouyssou Denis,Pirlot Marc

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Information Systems and Management,Management Science and Operations Research,Modeling and Simulation,General Computer Science,Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Reference37 articles.

1. Some remarks on the notion of compensation in MCDM;Bouyssou;European Journal of Operational Research,1986

2. On some properties of outranking relations based on a concordance–discordance principle;Bouyssou,1992

3. Outranking relations: Do they have special properties?;Bouyssou;Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis,1996

4. An axiomatic approach to noncompensatory sorting methods in MCDM, I: The case of two categories;Bouyssou;European Journal of Operational Research,2007

5. An axiomatic approach to noncompensatory sorting methods in MCDM, II: More than two categories;Bouyssou;European Journal of Operational Research,2007

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A regret-based query selection strategy for the incremental elicitation of the criteria weights in an SRMP model;Operational Research;2024-03-04

2. ELECTRE Methods: A Survey on Roman Słowiński Contributions;Intelligent Decision Support Systems;2022

3. A gained and lost dominance score method with conflict analysis for green economy development evaluation;Annals of Operations Research;2021-09-01

4. Simple ranking method using reference profiles: incremental elicitation of the preference parameters;4OR;2021-07-20

5. Finding the most sustainable wind farm sites with a hierarchical outranking decision aiding method;Annals of Operations Research;2017-07-28