When does unbiased become biased?

Author:

Kaptchuk Ted J.

Abstract

AbstractSince the 1960s, homoeopaths, along with biomedical physicians, have generally acknowledged the double-blind, randomized, controlled trial (RCT) as the ‘gold standard’ for establishing the efficacy of a clinical intervention. The homoeopathic profession has, however, been ambivalent about the incorporation of the RCT model for the internal validation of homoeopathic medicines. This paper looks at important components of the RCT such as blind assessment, randomization and statistical inference and examines some of the historical and scientific issues about their adoption for homoeopathic provings.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Complementary and alternative medicine,Pharmacology

Reference68 articles.

1. Complementary medicine—efficacy beyond the placebo effect;Kaptchuk,1996

2. Professional organisation and the development of medical knowledge: two interpretations of homoeopathy;Rankin,1988

3. Report on a proving of Pulsatilla 3x;Clover;Br Hom J,1980

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Provings—Volume II;Homeopathy;2006-04

2. Homeopathic pathogenetic trials of Acidum malicum and Acidum ascorbicum;British Homeopathic Journal;2001-07

3. Is the Scientific Publishing of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Objective?;The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine;1999-12

4. Methodologic considerations for research in traditional (alternative) medicine;Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology;1998-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3