Guidelines for Venous Thromboembolism and Clinical Practice in Italy: A Nationwide Survey-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Guidelines for Venous Thromboembolism and Clinical Practice in Italy: A Nationwide Survey

Published:2008-05 Issue:3 Volume:22 Page:319-327
ISSN:0890-5096
Container-title:Annals of Vascular Surgery
language:en
Short-container-title:Annals of Vascular Surgery

Author:

de Franciscis Stefano,Agus Giovanni Battista,Bisacci Roberto,Botta Giuseppe,Gasbarro Vincenzo,Domanin Maurizio,Nobile Carmelo Giuseppe Angelo,Serra Raffaele

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery

Reference15 articles.

1. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy;Geerts;Chest,2004

2. Incidence of venous thromboembolism verifyed by necroscopy over 30 years;Lindblad;BMJ,1991

3. Challenges in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in the elderly;Di Minno;J Thromb Haemost,2004

4. Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical management;Wells;Lancet,1997

5. Reduction in fatal pulmonary embolism and venous thrombosis by perioperative administration of subcutaneous heparin. Overview of results of randomized trials in general, orthopedic, and urologic surgery;Collins;N Engl J Med,1988

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Clinical guidelines versus current clinical practice for the management of deep vein thrombosis;Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders;2021-09

2. Follow-up of guidelines and impact on the management of suspected deep vein thrombosis in emergency departments;JMV-Journal de Médecine Vasculaire;2020-12

3. Biomarkers for precision medicine in phlebology and wound care: a systematic review;Acta Phlebologica;2017-11

4. Current knowledge on venous and lymphatic ulcers. A systematic review on evidence-based medicine;Acta Phlebologica;2017-11

5. Questionnaires used to assess barriers of clinical guideline use among physicians are not comprehensive, reliable, or valid: a scoping review;Journal of Clinical Epidemiology;2017-06