1. Arrow, K., Solow, R., Leamer, E., Portney, P., Randner, R., Schuman, H., 1993. Report of the NOAA Panel on contingent valuations. U.S. Federal Register, 15 January, 58, vol. 10, pp. 4601–4614
2. Bishop, R.C., Heberlein, 1990. The contingent valuation method. In: Johnson, R.L., Johnson, G.V. (Eds.), Economic valuation of natural resources: Issues, Theory and Applications, Westview Press, Boulder, CO
3. Bostedt, G., 1995a. The right of common access and option price – modelling and empirical testing In: Bostedt, G. Benefits of amenities in the forest environment –four papers based on contingent valuation. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Department of forest Economics, Report 110, dissertation 18, p. 24
4. Bostedt, G., Mattson, L., 1995b. The value of forests for tourism in Sweden. In: Bostedt, G. Benefits of amenities in the forest environment -four papers based on contingent valuation. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Department of forest Economics, Report 110, dissertation 18, p. 17
5. Welfare measurements using contingent valuation: a comparison of techniques;Boyle;Am. J. Agric. Econ.,1988