Has robot-assisted pyeloplasty reached outcome parity with laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children <15kg? A Paediatric YAU international multi-center study.
-
Published:2024-09
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1477-5131
-
Container-title:Journal of Pediatric Urology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Journal of Pediatric Urology
Author:
Bindi EdoardoORCID,
Cobellis Giovanni,
Hoen Lisette Aimee‘t,
Lammers Rianne Janna MarieORCID,
O’Kelly Fardod,
Dönmez Muhammet İrfanORCID,
Baydilli NumanORCID,
Haid Bernhard,
Marco Beatriz Bañuelos,
Atwa AhmedORCID,
Madarriaga Yesica QuirozORCID,
Masieri LorenzoORCID,
Sforza SimoneORCID
Reference32 articles.
1. Has the robot caught up? National trends in utilization, perioperative outcomes, and cost for open, laparoscopic, and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty in the United States from 2003 to 2015;Varda;J Pediatr Urol,2018
2. Outcomes after pediatric open, laparoscopic, and robotic pyeloplasty at academic institutions;Chan;J Pediatr Urol,2017
3. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty compared with open pyeloplasty in children;Ravish;J Endourol,2007
4. Retroperitoneoscopic One-Trocar-Assisted Pyeloplasty in Children: An Age-Related Evaluation;Cobellis;J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2017
5. Considerations regarding pain management and anesthesiological aspects in pediatric patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery: robotic vs laparoscopic-thoracoscopic approach;Molinaro;J Robot Surg,2020