Author:
Boyer L.,Baumstarck-Barrau K.,Cano N.,Zendjidjian X.,Belzeaux R.,Limousin S.,Magalon D.,Samuelian J.-C.,Lancon C.,Auquier P.
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundThere is a growing concern about satisfaction with inpatient psychiatric services. There are currently numerous satisfaction instruments available to psychiatric inpatients, but little guidance on which among them to select.AimsTo provide an overview of the psychometric properties and the content of satisfaction instruments available to psychiatric inpatients.MethodsSystematic searches of Medline database to identify inpatient satisfaction questionnaires. Assessment of the instruments according to relevant psychometric properties.ResultsFifteen satisfaction instruments were identified. The target population differed according to the instrument. Methods used to generate items were heterogeneous. These instruments were based on a mixed approach including patients’ points of view, expert opinions, and literature reviews, causing the content of questionnaires to vary. Reliability and validity were not systematically tested.ConclusionThe validation of a common inpatient satisfaction instrument is a major challenge. Recommendations for the future development of satisfaction instruments may include: item generation based exclusively on the patient's point of view; a validation process on a large and representative population; and an instrument combining generic (core questionnaire) and specific (additional modules) approaches.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Cited by
67 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献