Clinical staging in panic disorder and agoraphobia

Author:

Pavlichenko A.

Abstract

There is an increasing literature about the implementation of the staging model in many mental disorders. According to this approach, there are four stages of a psychiatric disorder: prodromal stage, acute manifestations, residual phase, chronic. In this study, we empirically investigate whether additional clinical variables such as clinical manifestations and comorbid disorders may be useful to modify the staging model to panic disorder (PD).We distinguished inpatient sample (n = 79) with a diagnosis of “panic disorder” according to the DSM-IV criteria. We propose that the inclusion of prodromal stage of PD does not make clinical sense since the different unspecific neurotic symptoms may proceed to a variety of anxiety and depressive disorders. First stage was characterized by the situationally predisposed panic attacks (PA) with both somatic and cognitive symptoms. Comorbid disorders included somatoform disorders and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). During second stage individuals experienced agoraphobic avoidance until traveling in public transport. On the other hand, spontaneous PA were accompanied by the only somatic but not cognitive symptoms. The most common patterns of comorbidity were GAD and alcohol misuse. Third stage was associated with the absence or limited symptom attacks and chronic agoraphobia. Major depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder might be an integral part of the clinical manifestations. This study supports that the staging model in PD might be updated by the detailed description of clinical manifestations and comorbid disorders at each stage that may help the practitioners to choose the best strategy for the treatment of a particular patient.Disclosure of interestThe author has not supplied his declaration of competing interest.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3